A response to Jessica’s objections to Barack Obama
Wednesday, October 15th, 2008
Thanks for your comments Jessica. That comment thread was getting a little long so I decided to create a new post to carry on the discussion. For those of you who haven’t been following along, the original post can be found here.
Obama’s plan is to be funded at least in part by:
- Repealing Bush’s tax breaks for the wealthy
- Enacting a windfall profits tax on the oil company’s that are quarter-after-quarter literally making world record profits
- Raising taxes for families with income over $600,000 (approximately—source)
- Increase capital gains tax rates to 20 percent for those earning more than $200,000, $250,000 for married couples (no one expects this to bring in much revenue in the immediate future)
- Phased withdrawal from Iraq
Your argument of $50 billion vs. $700 billion is misguided. The $700 billion package is an effort to try to stop the financial sector crisis from bringing down the entire economy, and was not George Bush’s plan. Barack Obama’s $50 billion plan is divided evenly between a State Growth Fund to support state health, education, housing, health, etc programs and prevent increases in property taxes; and a jobs and growth fund to aid infrastructure projects and prevent job loss. The $700 billion package exists whether Obama’s $50 billion package exists or not, and Bush, McCain, and Obama all supported the $700 billion bill.
“His tax cuts are good for the everyday American, but he can easily say that because the occupants of the $250,000 and up tax brackets pay about 80% off all the income taxes already.”
To be more precise: in 2004 the 25% of the population with the highest earnings paid 84% of the income and at the end of 2001 10% of the population owned 71% of the wealth. That is why we have a progressive income tax system. Even paying a higher tax rate, the wealthy keep a much larger amount of money than the poor who are paying a lower rate.
You state in a very general way that you are against all of the regulation that Obama wants to put on the mortgage companies. I read that as you are against certain elements rather than that you are literally against all regulation. I find it hard to believe that anyone would still espouse a position in support of predatory lenders, and will not assume that that is your position. It is hard to go much farther on this without more detail about what you object to.
As to your statement that the subprime mortgage crisis is not solely the bank’s fault, I can cede to you that many of these people could have avoided getting themselves into the mess they are in had they been more savvy. The same could be said of the victims of con-men. The parallels here are nearly direct. Subprime mortgages are called subprime because the lenders know that it is unlikely that they will be paid back. Even if it was a crime to get yourself into bad financial straights, that would leave each mortgage holder responsible for one crime. The financial institutions that defrauded these people are responsible for thousands.
A subprime loan is categorized as a subprime loan based on the financial and credit profile of the consumers to which they are marketed. In other words subprime loans are marketed to those that the lending agency thinks are likely to be unable to pay. By your own logic these are the people that are least likely to understand credit. There is a reason why this is also known as predatory lending.
I think it is true that good credit is not hard to achieve when you come from a solid financial foundation to start with, but not everyone is fortunate enough to be in that situation.
I don’t find anything at all ridiculous about making a standard tax return simple enough to do in 5 minutes. He isn’t saying that if you want to hire an accountant to do your taxes for you or spend a lot of time and claim individual deductions on your own that you can’t. A lot of people don’t have the time and resources to hire an accountant or pore through the tax code trying to find every possible deduction they could be making. For those people the standard deductions will probably save them money. No matter what you do on the bottom end of the tax scale you aren’t going to hugely effect the amount of overall tax revenue the country receives.
His 10% Mortgage Interest Tax Credit is universal. This means it can be applied to homeowners that do not itemize on their tax returns. This means approximately 10 million people who are not receiving the credit now will.
“Reform Social Security: John McCain will fight to save the future of Social Security and believes that we may meet our obligations to the retirees of today and the future without raising taxes. John McCain supports supplementing the current Social Security system with personal accounts—but not as a substitute for addressing benefit promises that cannot be kept. John McCain will reach across the aisle, but if the Democrats do not act, he will. No problem is in more need of honesty than the looming financial challenges of entitlement programs. Americans have the right to know the truth and John McCain will not leave office without fixing the problems that threatens our future prosperity and power. ”
This is as close to a statement on Social Security policy as I could find on the McCain website so I’m not sure what his policy really entails, but given the current financial sector crisis, the idea that investing your retirement funds would have been a smart choice seems a bit off.
The embryonic stem cells used in research are created in fertility clinics for the purpose of fertility treatments. Not all embryos can be used for treatment and many are discarded. I have never been able to understand why it would be the argument that it is superior to throw away these tiny clusters of cells (that were never going to develop into a human being anyway), instead of than using them to try to improve actual living people’s lives. Whether you are anti-abortion or pro-choice this doesn’t seem like an issue that should be controversial.
I don’t know about you, but I never managed to find a job in college that would pay me $40/hour. How is getting a job better than doing 100 hours of public service to receive a $4,000 credit for school? Obama’s plan benefits the community, thee student, and the future of the workforce and economy all at the same time.
As for Obama’s policy on family farms, how is the tax code to distinguish from the “family farms” and the agricorps if not by overall income? It may be the case that some who have started off as family farms have done well enough that they can bear the higher tax bracket. Having grown up on a farm it is certainly not my experience that most farms are incorporated or large. Regardless, Obama is not anti-farm, if anything he is just not giving large farms preferential treatment
I won’t argue with you on education. I think you are likely right on this issue, but it is kind of a non-sequitur, as McCain doesn’t state any position on this issue either.
Regarding gun control, Obama supports a permanent reinstatement of the assault weapons ban, he is opposed to the confiscation of guns from private citizens. The basic difference between he and McCain is that McCain supports the repeal of the assault weapons ban. Please have a look at the definition of the weapons that would be banned and consider whether civilians really need to have these types of weapons.
Tighter control of mentally unstable people who go shoot up schools is great, but the problem is that they’ve already gone and shot up schools. I’m not sure that we are all that lax on people once they go shoot up schools. Perhaps I am unclear as to exactly what you are trying to propose in this regard, and how it is related with not wanting gun control.
Bill Ayers’ terrorist activities took place 40 years ago when Obama was 8. They are not close and Obama has publicly denounced Ayer’s radical actions from the 1960’s. McCain was in the room when Marylin Shannon praised domestic terrorist Shelley Shannon (no relation) at a conference of the Oregon Citizen’s Alliance in the early 90’s. In fact he spoke right after her and never disavowed her comments. Shelley Shannon is an abortion doctor shooter, and Marylin Shannon was a McCain delegate at this years convention! By the Ayer’s standard according to the McCain campaign; McCain is a supporter of domestic terrorists. I think you can agree that the notion is as ridiculous in the case of McCain as it is in the case of Obama.
Finally on the bailout issue, I think we’ve run this into the ground a little bit, but this bailout of the financial industry harkens back to a bailout during the 80’s of the Savings and Loan Industry. McCain was one of the 5 Senators implicated in the Keating 5 scandal. In fact McCain was the only one of the five with close social and personal ties to Keating, and in 1989 Phoenix New Times writer Tom Fitzpatrick opined that McCain was the “most reprehensible” of the five senators. There is no dispute about this and it is a matter of congressional record. If you aren’t familiar with it please go look it up.
Shlly Shnnn dd th rght thng. Sh trd t stp tht bbykllng brtnst Grg Tllr frm mrdrng ny mr hlplss bbs. Y spprt f tht bbykllng brtn spprtr Brck bm pts bld f nncnt chldrn n yr hnds t.
That type of rhetoric is not welcome here. You have been disemvowelled.
Just a quick word on disemvowelling, as this is the first time it has been used here, and hopefully it will never be used again.
I have chosen to disemvowel commenters like this because I don’t want to just completely delete a view that I disagree with, even a despicable comment like the one above (there are limits to that but hopefully we’ll never reach those).
Disemvowelling allows people who are determined to figure out what the commenter was saying, but prevents those who don’t want to be exposed to racism, threats, and advocation of violence; from accidentally reading it. I don’t want to spend much more time on this, but if there are questions, we can discuss it.
Two wrongs don’t make a right. Killing abortion doctors is not the right approach to ending abortion. UltraBob, thanks for having no tolerance for that type of comment.
This isn’t very cool. I just spent most of the past hour writing a response and now it’s not showing up.
Is there a character limit on this thing? I will re-write it and re-post it, but its gonna have to wait until morning. Its bedtime for me.
Jessica, I’m sorry your post didn’t show up. If you continue to have problems please let me know. there may be a character limit, but you would have gotten an error message.
Unfortunately, I don’t’ have the time to do a thorough analysis. I agree with Bob’s explanations and/or positions re: gun control, stem cell research, education.
“In spite of all of these things, the real deal breakers for me are abortion and embryonic stem cell research. I don’t understand how somebody can claim to be a Christian and then support the destruction of human life.”
Jessica, I appreciate this statement. I too am pro-life. And this used to be a deal-breaker for me, but when I weigh all the other issues, I will still vote for Obama b/c I think overall his platform is more “Christian” than McCain’s. I find it ironic and hypocritical that so many fight for a pro-life platform, but will then turn around and say that every individual is not entitled to health care. So we’ll guarantee a fetus’s right to life, but will do nothing to step in and ensure that fetus’s health once it has grown to adulthood.
Also, FWIW (probably very little) I’m not really a huge fan of Obama’s healthcare plan. I preferred (gasp!) Sen. Clinton’s. I think Obama’s does too little. But in all honesty, there has to be some compromise and Obama’s is a step closer. I just don’t think it will resolve anything and in the long run, health care is still going to be a mess in our country.
Re: Bill Ayers. Come on now. McCain looks like a fool for bringing this up over and over. I think it shows how desperate his campaign is becoming. What really disappoints me is that so many Americans are won over by McCain’s stance on this non-substantive accusation. Ayers and Obama served on an educational committee together. Obama has never supported terrorism. I have a half brother who’s spent most of his life in prison; that doesn’t make me a convict. I have another brother who’s one of the greatest all-around people I’ve ever known (despite his right-wing tendencies). That doesn’t mean I’m a great person by mere association (wish it did).
Re: subprime mortgages, I can’t say it any better than Bob. Predatory, predatory, predatory. The banks knew what they were getting into and prey on the uneducated and poor. You see this in so many industries, (i.e. payday loans).
Re: last night’s debate. How funny was it that McCain kept talking about how negative Obama’s campaign was and then keeps repeating the “he supports terrorists” mantra (with Ayers and then again later with Chavez). I also “loved” that McCain’s only comeback to the discussion re: his supporters shouting “Kill him [Obama]” at rallies was that his supporters are the greatest group of patriots there are. Nice! Wouldn’t want to take a chance at disenfranchising some of your biggoted backers, now would you?
Overall, I am more and more impressed with Obama’s diplomacy. It will be refreshing to see that in the White House.
Billie, you need to respond so Jessica doesn’t feel ganged up on.
p.s. I can’t wait for the SNL “Joe the Plumber” spoofs.
My response did not work so apparently there is a character limit. Three pages seems to be too much. I’ve got it saved on my computer though so I’ll post it as soon as I watch the instructional video and learn how to post.
I just double checked and there shouldn’t be. Could you send me the comment by e-mail so I can try and see if I can figure out what the problem is?
I just made it into a post above, but I’ll email it to you anyway so you can check it out.
Somehow I missed Chenoa’s comments until just now. Thanks for that. I think you need to make our future responses, you are much better at this than I. Law school and brains do count for something it seems.
Could you go into more detail on the differences in the Clinton and Obama plans? I’m not disagreeing, I was just so turned off by Clinton’s campaign that I never really looked into her health care plan that much.
Finally, I agree, Billie it is time to step up to the plate. Jessica is fighting a valiant solo battle to defend a candidate that it is increasingly difficult to defend. Duty calls.